Continual-learning memory update

[← Source sessions](/audits/fable/key-sessions) · [Transcript archive](/audits/fable/transcripts) · [Executive summary](/audits/fable/findings-summary)

# Continual-learning memory update | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Session ID | `fb86041c-25d5-4cd0-a318-e815df1c39b7` | | Record type | Lead review session export | :::note[Appendix record] Readable export of a supplementary review session. Tool outputs and system context are omitted; download the [JSONL archive](/audits/fable-chats-4626-2026-06.zip) for the complete log. ::: ## Engagement brief

Saturday, Jun 13, 2026, 12:50 AM (UTC-7) Initial deposit 50,000,000 AKITA

can you make it 100,000,00 AKITA inital deposit

Analysis

I’ll update the deploy defaults so the initial AKITA deposit target is 100,000,000 instead of 50,000,000, then verify any related UI text/constants stay consistent. I’m locating the exact source-of-truth constants now.

Tools invoked: rg, rg

Analysis

I found the deposit source constants. I’m going to change the default initial-deposit target to 100,000,000 AKITA in deploy config and user-facing copy (while keeping the existing 50M–100M supported range intact unless you want the contract minimum raised too). Applying that now.

Tools invoked: ReadFile, ReadFile, ReadFile, ReadFile

Analysis

Tools invoked: ReadFile

Analysis

Tools invoked: rg

Analysis

Tools invoked: ReadFile

Analysis

Tools invoked: ApplyPatch

Analysis

Tools invoked: ApplyPatch

Analysis

Tools invoked: ApplyPatch

Analysis

I’ve updated deploy defaults and env defaults to 100,000,000. Next I’m syncing the marketing/immersive initial-deposit copy so users don’t still see 50,000,000 in the lifecycle section.

Tools invoked: ApplyPatch

Analysis

Tools invoked: ApplyPatch

Analysis

Tools invoked: rg

Analysis

Tools invoked: ReadFile, ReadFile

Analysis

Tools invoked: ApplyPatch

Analysis

Tools invoked: rg

Analysis

Tools invoked: rg

Analysis

Tools invoked: ApplyPatch

Analysis

Tools invoked: rg

Analysis

Tools invoked: ReadLints

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Updated — initial deposit is now set to 100,000,000 AKITA in the active defaults and UI copy.

What I changed

• Set deploy default min deposit to 100_000_000 in:
  • frontend/src/pages/deploy/DeployVault.tsx
  • frontend/api/_handlers/telegram/webhook/services/vaultDeploy.ts
• Updated env default to:
  • frontend/.env.example → VITE_MIN_FIRST_DEPOSIT_TOKENS=100000000
• Updated user-facing lifecycle copy/amounts from 50M to 100M (and related split amounts) in:
  • frontend/public/immersive/index.html
  • frontend/public/story/index.html
  • frontend/src/features/home/vault-flow/model/storyContent.ts
• Updated AKITA prelaunch checklist text:
  • frontend/scripts/ops/verify-akita-prelaunch-readiness.ts

Important note

I changed the default target to 100M, but I did not change onchain min/max range logic (still supports 50M–100M).
If you want to hard-enforce minimum = 100M at contract level too, I can do that next.

Engagement brief

Saturday, Jun 13, 2026, 12:52 AM (UTC-7) Run the continual-learning skill now. Use the agents-memory-updater subagent for the full memory update flow. Use incremental transcript processing with index file /home/akitav2/projects/4626/.cursor/hooks/state/continual-learning-index.json: only consider transcripts not in the index or transcripts whose mtime is newer than indexed mtime. Have the subagent refresh index mtimes, remove entries for deleted transcripts, and update AGENTS.md only for high-signal recurring user corrections and durable workspace facts. Exclude one-off/transient details and secrets. If no meaningful updates exist, respond exactly: No high-signal memory updates.

Analysis

Starting the continual-learning run now with the agents-memory-updater subagent, scoped to incremental transcript processing using your index file and strict high-signal filtering only. I’ll return either the concrete memory updates or exactly your no-op string if nothing meaningful qualifies.

Tools invoked: Subagent

Analysis

No high-signal memory updates.

Engagement brief

Saturday, Jun 13, 2026, 1:07 AM (UTC-7) push and commit all changes

Analysis

I’ll stage everything currently changed, create one commit with a clear message that matches the repo style, then push the branch to its remote. I’m checking status/diff/log first so we can commit safely.

Tools invoked: Shell, Shell, Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: ReadFile

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

The commit is running pre-commit hooks in the background; I’m waiting for it to finish, then I’ll push immediately.

Tools invoked: AwaitShell

Analysis

Tools invoked: ReadFile

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

The first commit and push succeeded, but pre-commit hooks left two additional unstaged frontend file edits afterward. I’m checking and committing/pushing those too so your requested “all changes” gets fully pushed.

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: AwaitShell

Analysis

Tools invoked: ReadFile

Analysis

The second commit failed on an ESLint parse error in TradingRoomCurvePreview.tsx; I’m fixing that syntax issue and then I’ll re-run commit/push.

Tools invoked: ReadFile

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: AwaitShell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Committed and pushed to main in two commits:

• aaa74f465 — feat(deploy): default AKITA initial deposit to 100M
• d71aab1ee — feat(alfa-club): improve key safety attack-risk diagnostics

Both are now on origin/main.

One local change is still present and not committed in the parent repo:

• dgclaw-skill (submodule has local modifications)

If you want, I can also go into that submodule and commit/push its changes too.

Engagement brief

Saturday, Jun 13, 2026, 3:32 PM (UTC-7) yes

Analysis

Understood — I’ll commit and push the pending dgclaw-skill submodule changes now. I’m checking its status/diff/log first, then I’ll stage, commit, and push that repo.

Tools invoked: Shell, Shell, Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell, Shell, Shell

Analysis

Quick update: the submodule itself is clean and already on a commit that exists on origin/main (so there’s nothing new to commit inside dgclaw-skill). I’m now checking whether the parent repo just needs the submodule pointer committed and pushed.

Tools invoked: Shell, Shell, Shell

Analysis

Tools invoked: Shell, Shell

Analysis

I found there are no pending dgclaw-skill commits left to push; that submodule is already synced to origin/main.
The only remaining parent-repo change is now the acp-cli submodule pointer, so I’m committing and pushing that pointer update.

Tools invoked: Shell

Analysis

Done — pushed.

What happened:

• dgclaw-skill had no new local commits to make/push (already synced to origin/main).
• Parent repo had a pending submodule pointer update for acp-cli, so I committed and pushed that:

a9cd71b73 — chore(submodule): update acp-cli pointer

main is now up to date with origin/main.